Donnerstag 24. Januar 2019
Warenkorb: Der Warenkorb ist leer.
  • 1.bestellen
  • 2.Warenkorb ändern
  • 3.zur Kassa gehen
Sprache: ENGLISHSeiten: 143-172https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-34-3-143
Pelle, Anita; Somosi, Sarolta

Possible Challenges for EU-Level Industrial Policy: Where Do Potentials for Policy Improvement in Central and Eastern European Countries Lie?

Regarding the issue of industrial policy in the 21st century, we are facing fundamental changes, including the servitisation of industry, the potential in upskilling and upgrading, the process of digital transformation, and the evolution of value webs and complex business ecosystems. In industry within the EU, we can identify internal differences: in principle, the EU is divided into a core and a periphery or, possibly, several peripheries.
How will EU member states cope with these challenges? How is the EU-level industrial policy strategy likely to affect member states’ (relative) positions? Is there policy-level differentiation? If so, how does it work; if not, what are the implications?

 

Article (digital)

5,90 EUR
Stk
Andere Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Campos, Juliana Gomes

Latin American Developmentalism in the 21st Century: An Analysis of the Governmental Industrial Policies of the Workers` Party in Brazil

Sprache: ENGLISHSeiten: 46-72https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-34-3-46
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

This paper aims to analyse the feasibility of the return of industrial policies to foster development as a post-neoliberal alternative in the era of globalisation. With Partido dos Trabalhadores government, Brazil was considered one of the main countries in the Pink Tide. The government plan promised to foster industry modernisation and reduce poverty by bringing the state back into the picture to coordinate a project between public institutions, private sector and civil society in order to improve the country’s position in the global economy. This paper thus analyses PT industrial policies to investigate the characteristics of a post-neoliberal development model in Latin America as an alternative to neoliberalism.

Ban, Cornel (2012): Brazil's liberal neo-developmentalism. New paradigm or edited orthodoxy? In: Review of International Political Economy 20 (2), 298-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.660183

 

Barcia, Manuel (2016): Dilma Rousseff's impeachment was led by the white, wealthy men who now make up the Brazilian cabinet. In: Independent, 15.05.2016.

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/dilma-rousseffs-impeachment-was-led-by-the-white-wealthy-men-who-now-make-up-the-brazilian-cabinet-a7030761.html, 25.03.2017.

Bielschowsky, Ricardo (2009): Sixty years of ECLAC: Structuralism and Neo-structuralism. In: Cepal Review 97, 171-192.

 

Boito, Armando (2007): Estado e Burguesia no Capitalismo Neoliberal. In: Revista de Sociologia e Política. Curitiba 28, 57-73.

 

Boito, Armando/Saad-Filho, Alfredo (2016): State, State Institutions, and Political Power in Brazil. In: Latin American Perspectives 43(2), 190-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X15616120

 

Bracarense, Natalia (2013): Economic Development in Latin America: Lessons from History of Economic Thought. In: Journal of Economic Issues XLVII(1), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624470105

 

Cano, Wilson./Gonçalves da Silva, Ana Lucia (2010): Política Industrial do Governo Lula. In: Texto para Discussão IE/UNICAMP 181, 1-27.

 

Chang, Ha-Joon (2003): The Market, the State and Institutions in Economic Development Ch. 2. In: Chang, Ha-Joon (ed.).: Rethinking Development Economics. London: Anthem Press, 41-60.

 

Chodor, Tom (2015): Neoliberal Hegemony and the Pink Tide in Latin America: Breaking Up with TINA? London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137444684

 

Curado, Marcelo (2017): Por que o governo Dilma não pode ser classificado como novo-desenvolvimentista? In: Revista de Economia Política 37 (146), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572016v37n01a07

 

Dang, G./Sui Pheng, L. (2015): Infrastructure Investments in Developing Economies. Singapore: Springer Science and Business.

 

Devlin, Robert./Moguillansky, Graciela (2011): Breeding Latin America Tigers: Operational Principles for Rehabilitating Industrial Policies. Chile: ECLAC.

 

Di Maio, Michele (2009): Industrial Policies in Developing Countries: History and perspectives. In: Cimoli, Mario/Dosi, Giovanni/Stiglitz, Joseph E. (eds.). Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235261.003.0005

 

Doctor, Mahrukh (2012): Brazil’s New Government and Trade: An Evaluation of Policy and Performance. In: Critical Sociology 38(6), 799-807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920512440573

 

Dos Reis Alvarez, Roberto (2006): A Política Industrial, Tecnológica e de ComércioExterior (PITCE) e a atuação da ABDI. In: Workshop PCI (Rede TSQC –ABRACI –FINEP).

ECLAC (2012): Structural Change for Equality: An Integrated Approach to Development. In: Thirty-fourth Session of ECLAC, San Salvador, 27-31. August, 2012.

 

Erber, F.S. (2006). “Inovação tecnológica”. In: Facto, Jun./Jul. 2006.

Grugel, Jean/Riggirozzi, Pía (2012): Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis. In: Development and Change 43(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x

 

Gudynas, Eduardo (2010): The New Extractivism of the 21st Century: Ten Urgent Theses about Extractivism in Relation to Current South American Progressivism. In: Americas Program Report. Washington, DC: Center for International Policy.

 

Guerriero, Ian Ramalho (2012): Formulaçao e Avaliação de Política Industrial e o Caso da PDP. In: Tese (doutorado) – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Economia.

 

Heidrich, Pablo/Tussie, Diana (2009): Post-Neoliberalism and the New-Left in the Americas: The Pathways of Economic and Trade Policies. In: Macdonald, Laura/Ruckert, Arne (eds.): Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230232822_3

 

IPEA (2016): Produto interno bruto (PIB) - indústria - referência 2000. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/Default.aspx, 04.11.2016.

 

KAS (2015): Relatórios dos países: Brasil e Argentina. In: http://www.kas.de/brasilien/pt/publications/42326/,12.01.2018.

 

Kerstenetzky, Celia Lessa (2014): The Brazilian Social Developmental State: A Progressive Agenda in a (Still) Conservative Political Society. In: Williams, Michelle (ed.): The End of the Developmental State?, London: Routledge, 172-196.

 

Khan, Shahrukh Rafi (2011): Towards New Developmentalism: Context, Program, and Constraints. In: Khan, Shahrukh Rafi and Christiansen, Jens (eds.): Towards New Developmentalism: Market as Means rather than Master. New York: Routledge, 252-278.

 

Kupfer, David (2013): Dez Anos de Política Industrial. In: Revista Valor Econômico,. Available in: http://www.ie.ufrj.br/clipping/download/dezanos.pdf, 08.07.2013.

 

Lall, Sanjaya (2004): Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness. In: G-24 Discussion Paper Series 28, 3-34.

 

Laplane, Mariano Francisco (2014): A indústria ainda é o motor do crescimento? Teoria e evidências. In: Jackson de Toni, Jackson (ed.): Dez anos de política industrial. Balanço e Perspectivas (2004-2014), 23-39.

 

Laplane, Mariano./Sarti, F. (2006): Prometeu acorrentado: o Brasil na indústria mundial no início do século XXI. In: Carneiro, R. (Org.): A Supremacia dos Mercados e a Política Econômica do Governo Lula. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 271-291.

 

Leiva, Fernando Ignacio (2008a): Latin American Neostructuralism: The contradictions of post-neoliberal development. Minnesota/USA: University of Minnesota Press.

 

Marangos, John (2009): What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy. In: The Journal of Socio-Economics 38, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.007

 

Melo, Alberto/Clare-Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés (2006): Productive Development Policies and Supporting Institutions in Latin America. In: Inter-American Development Bank (BID) – Competitive Studies Series Working Paper C-I 06.

 

MERCOSUL (n.d.): Saiba mais sobre o MERCOSUL. In: http://www.mercosul.gov.br/saiba-mais-sobre-o-mercosul, 12.01.2018.

 

MERCOSUR (2015): MERCOSUR: Structuras y Agendas. In: http://www.mercosur.int/innovaportal/file/7338/1/mercosur_academico_final_es_web.pdf, 29.12.2017.

 

Meyer-Stammer, Jörg (1997): New patterns of governance for industrial change: Perspectives for Brazil. In: Journal of Development Studies 33 (3), 364-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389708422470

 

Milanez, Bruno/Santos, Rodrigo S.P. (2015): Topsy-Turvy Neo-developmentalism: Naan Analysis of the Current Brazilian Model of Development. In: Revista de Estudios Sociales (53), 12-28. https://doi.org/10.7440/res53.2015.01

 

Milani, Ana Maria Rita (2011): Questões para se pensar o desenvolvimento no Brasil. especialização regressiva e pauta exportadora no período 2003-2010. In: IPEA - CODE 2011: Anais do I Circuito de Debates Acadêmicos, 1-19.

 

Munck, Ronaldo (20082): Contemporary Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09082-9

 

Peres, Wilson/Primi, Annalisa (2009): Theory and Practice of Industrial Policy. Evidence from the Latin American Experience. In: CEPAL: Serie desarollo productiveo 187.

Portal ABDI (2016): Política Industrial. http://www.abdi.com.br/Paginas/politica_industrial.aspx, 17.11.2016.

 

Portal ABDI (n.d.): Ações ABDI FOCEM. http://www.abdi.com.br/Paginas/acao_resumo.aspx?i=105, 12.01.2018.

 

Riggirozzi, Pía/Tussie, Diana (2012): Chapter 1. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America. In: Riggirozzi, Pía/Tussie, Diana (eds.): The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America. Dordrecht et al.: Springer, 1-16.

 

Saad-Filho, Alfredo (2010): Growth, Poverty and Inequality: From Washington Consensus to Inclusive Growth. In: DESA Working Paper 100.

 

Saad-Filho, Alfredo (2013): Brazil: Development Strategies and Social Change from Import-Substitution to the “Events of June”. In: Studies in Political Economy 94, 3-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19187033.2014.11674952

 

Saad-Filho, Alfredo (2015): A Critical Review of Brazil’s Recent Economic Policies. In: Centre for Development Policy and Research - Development Viewpoint (84).

 

Sanahuja, José Antonio (2012): Post-liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNASUR. In: EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2012/05.

 

Schneider, Ben Ross (2015): The Developmental state in Brazil: comparative and historical perspective). In: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 35 (138), 114-132. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a07

 

Scholz, Richard (2014): Paradigms in Development Economics. In: Politik und Wirtschaft – Volkswirtschaftliches Forschungsseminar. Universität Leipzig.

 

Singer, Hans Wolfgang (1975): The Strategy of International Development: Essays in the Economics of Backwardness. London: The Macmillan Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04228-9

 

Stiglitz, Joseph E. et al. (2009): The Future of Industrial Policies in the New Millennium: Toward a Knowledge-Centered Development Agenda Ch. 20. In Cimoli, Mario/Dosi, Giovanni/Stiglitz, Joseph E. (eds.): Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. New York: Oxford Press, 541-560.

 

Suzigan, Wilson./Furtado, João (2006): Política Industrial e Desenvolvimento”. In: Revista de Economia Política 26 (102), 163-185.. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572006000200001

 

Taylor, Marcus (2009): The Contradictions and Transformations of Neoliberalism in Latin America: from Structuring Adjustment to ‘Empowering the Poor’. In: Macdonald, Laura and Ruckert, Arne (eds.): Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 21-36. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230232822_2

 

Todaro, Michael P./Smith, Stephen C. (201211): Economic development. Boston: Pearson.

Urraca-Ruiz, Ana et al (2013): Qualificando o caráter ‘regressivo’ da especialização industrial do Brasil. In: Conferência Internacional LALICS 2013. http://www.redesist.ie.ufrj.br/lalics/papers/50_Qualificando_o_carater_regressivo_da_especializacao_industrial_do_Brasil.pdf, 20.09.2016.

 

Vázquez, Mariana/Ruiz Briceño, José (2009): O Mercosul na época de Lula e Kirchner: um balanço, seis anos depois. In: Revista Nueva Sociedad especial em Português 98, 33-48.

 

Vogeler, Colette Sophie (2016): Conventional Paths for New Challenges: Change and Continuity in Economic Policy in Brazil. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845265506

 

Yates, Julian S. /Bakker, Karen (2014): Debating the ‘post-neoliberal turn’ in Latin America. In: Progress in Human Geography 2014, 38(1), 62-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513500372

PT, Brazil, industrialization, developmentalism, post-neoliberalism

Weissenbacher, Rudy

A Ladder without Upper Rungs: On the Limitations of Industrial Policies in TNC Capitalism. The Case of the European Union

Sprache: ENGLISHSeiten: 73-107https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-34-3-73
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

Global production and trade is significantly organised by Transnational Companies (TNC). In this article, I will argue that even if one considers industrial development as a proxy for development or leading to development in a broad sense, the prospects for ‘progress’ in contemporary capitalism are very limited. I will revisit theory, method, and proxies for ‘development’ and ‘industrial development’, as used by Arrighi and Drangel (1986) and Arrighi et al. (2003). I will adapt their approach for a core-periphery typology in the EU, and use it in order to estimate industrial convergence compared with convergence in ‘development’ (in EU language: convergence and cohesion). Furthermore, I will suggest additional proxies to estimate (spatial) politico-economic power in the hierarchy of TNC capitalism. I will close with concluding remarks on policies, from a dependency perspective.

Adorno, Theodor (1972 [1968]) Spätkapitalismus oder Industriegesellschaft? Einleitungsvortrag zum 16. Deutschen Soziologentag. In: Theodor Adorno: Soziologische Schriften I. Hrsg. von Rolf Tiedemann. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, 354-370. (= Gesammelte Schriften 8)

 

Arrighi, Giovanni (1985): Fascism to Democratic Socialism. Logic and Limits of a Transition. In: Arrighi, Giovanni (ed.): Semiperipheral Development. The Politics of Southern Europe in the Twentieth Century. Beverly Hills, London, and New Delhi: Sage, 243-279. (=Explorations in the World-Economy 5)

 

Arrighi, Giovanni (1990): The Developmentalist Illusion: A Reconceptualization of the Semiperiphery. In: William Martin (ed.): Semiperipheral States in the World-Economy. Greenwood Press: Westport, CT, 11-42.

 

Arrighi, Giovanni/Drangel, Jessica (1986): The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone. In: Review 10 (1), 9-74. (=Anniversary Issue: The Work of the Fernand Braudel Center)

 

Arrighi, Giovanni/Silver, Beverly/Brewer, Benjamin (2003): Industrial Convergence, Globalization, and the Persistence of the North-South Divide. In: Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686319

 

Bair, Jennifer (2005): Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward. In: Competition & Change 9 (2), 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1179/102452905X45382

 

Bair, Jennifer (2009): Global Commodity Chains: Genealogy and Review. In: Bair, Jennifer (ed.): Frontiers of Commodity Chain Research. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1-34.

Bair, Jennifer (2014): Editor’s Introduction: Commodity Chains in and of the WorldSystem. In: Journal of World-Systems Research 20 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5195/JWSR.2014.574

 

Becker, Joachim (2018): Neo-Nationalismus in der EU: sozio-ökonomische Programmatik und Praxis. Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft No. 179. Vienna: AK Wien.

 

Becker, Joachim, and Weissenbacher, Rudy (2014): Berlin Consensus and Disintegration: Monetary Regime and Uneven Development in the EU. In: Dymarski, Włodzimierz/Frangakis, Marica/Leaman, Jeremy (eds.): The Deepening Crisis of the European Union: The Case for Radical Change. Analysis and Proposals from EuroMemo Group. Poznań: Poznań University of Economics Press, 5-32.

 

Becker, Joachim, and Weissenbacher, Rudy (2016): Heterodoxy from the right: Economic policy concepts of the nationalist right in Europe. Euro Memo Group: 22nd Conference on Alternative Economic Policy in Europe. Coimbra, Portugal, 15.09.-17.09.

 

Becker, Joachim, Franziska Disslbacher, and Rudy Weissenbacher (2015): Zwischen Deutschland und Osteuropa: Österreichs neue Mittellage. In: Beigewum (ed.): Politische Ökonomie Österreichs. Kontinuitäten und Veränderungen seit dem EU-Beitritt. Wien: Mandelbaum, 132-155.

 

Chase-Dunn, Christopher (ed.) (1982): Socialist States in the World System. Beverly Hills: Sage.

 

Chenery, Hollis (1960): Patterns of Industrial Growth. American Economic Review 50 (4), 624–654.

 

Crouch, Colin (2011): The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge and Malden: Polity

 

ECB – European Central Bank (2015): Real convergence in the euro area: evidence, theory and policy implications. In: ECB Economic Bulletin 5, 30-45.

 

ECB – European Central Bank: Statistical Data Warehouse, http://sdw.ecb.europe.eu

EU Commission (ed.) (n/y): AMECO database. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/ameco/user/serie/SelectSerie.cfm (Sept. 8, 2017)

 

Eurostat (ed.) (n/y1): Glossary:Purchasing power standard (PPS). Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Purchasing_power_standard_(PPS) (Sept. 8, 2017)

 

Eurostat (ed.) (n/y2): Glossary:Purchasing power parities (PPPs). Brussels, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Purchasing_power_parities_(PPPs) (Sept. 8, 2017)

 

Flassbeck, Heiner/Spiecker, Friederike (2011): The Euro - Story of Misunderstanding. In: Intereconomics 46 (4), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-011-0381-8

 

Galtung, Johan (1976): Self-Reliance: Concept, Practice and Rationale. In: Transcend International, https://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/Self-Reliance%20-%20Concept,%20Practice%20and%20Rationale.pdf (May 23, 2017)

 

Garcia-Bernardo, Javier/Fichtner Jan/Takes, Frank W./Heemskerk, Eelke M. (2017): Uncovering Offshore Financial Centers: Conduits and Sinks in the Global Corporate Ownership Network. In: Scientific Reports 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06322-9

 

Hopkins, Terence, and Wallerstein, Immanuel (1977): Patterns of Development of the Modern World-System. In: Review 1 (2), 11-145.

 

Kirby, Peadar (2010): Celtic Tiger in Collapse. Explaining the Weaknesses of the Irish Model. Second Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230278035

 

Lange, Peter (1985): Semiperiphery and Core in the European Context: Reflections on the Postwar Italian Experience. In: Arrighi, Giovanni (ed.) (1985): Semiperipheral Development. The Politics of Southern Europe in the Twentieth Century. Beverly Hills, London, and New Delhi, 179-214. (=Explorations in the World-Economy 5)

 

Maier, Gunther/Tödtling, Franz,/Trippl, Michaela (2006): Regional- und Stadtökonomik 2. Regionalentwicklung und Regionalpolitik. 3., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage. Wien and New York: Springer.

 

Monfort, Philippe (2008): Convergence of EU regions. Measures and evolution. Brussels: European Union (=Directorate-General for Regional Policy 1/2008).

 

OECD (n.y.) database, outward activity of multinationals by country of location - ISIC Rev 4, and population. http://stats.oecd.org (Sept. 8, 2017)

 

Soja, Edward (1980): The Socio-Spatial Dialectic. In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers 70 (2), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x

 

Stöllinger, Roman (2016): Structural Change and global value chains in the EU. In: Empirica 43 (4), 801-829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9349-z

 

UNCTAD (ed.) (2013): World Investment Report 2013. Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development. New York and Geneva.

 

UNCTAD (ed.) (2016): World Investment Report 2016. Investor Nationality: Policy Challenges. New York and Geneva.

 

UNCTAD (ed.) (2017a): World Investment Report 2017. Investment and the Digital Economy. New York and Geneva.

 

UNCTAD (ed.) (2017b): World Investment Report 2017: Annex Tables. http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/World%20Investment%20Report/Annex-Tables.aspx, October 13, 2017.

 

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1979): The Capitalist World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1984): The Politics of the World-Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

 

Wallerstein, Immanuel (1985): The Relevance of the Concept of Semiperiphery to Southern Europe. In: Giovanni Arrighi (ed.): Semiperipheral Development: The Politics of Southern Europe in the Twentieth Century. Berverly Hills: Sage, 531-539.

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (2005): Jugoslawien. Politische Ökonomie einer Desintegration. Wien: Promedia.

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (2007): Historical Considerations of Uneven Development in East Central Europe. In: Joachim Becker/Weissenbacher, Rudy (eds.): Dollarization, Euroization and Financial Instability. Central and Eastern European Countries between Stagnation and Financial Crisis? Marburg: Metropolis, 35-83.

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (2008): Keeping Up Appearances: Uneven Global Development in a System of Structural Imbalances. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXIV (4), 78-121. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-24-4-78

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (2015): Periphere Integration und Desintegration in Europa: Zur Aktualität der „Europäischen Dependenzschule“. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXXI (3), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-31-3-86

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (2018): Peripheral integration and disintegration in Europe: the ‘European dependency school’ revisited. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 26 (1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2017.1302875

 

Weissenbacher, Rudy (forthcoming monography): Integration and Disintegration of the European Periphery.

 

Wickham, James (2012): After the party’s over: the Irish employment model and the paradoxes of non-learning. In: Lehndorff, Steffen (ed.): A triumph of failed ideas. European models of capitalism in the crisis. Brussels: ETUI, 59-77.

 

Young, Andrew, Matthew Higgins, and Daniel Levy (2008): Sigma Convergence versus Beta Convergence: Evidence from U.S. County-Level Data. In: Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40 (5), 1083-1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00148.x

EU, core-periphery, uneven development, commodity chains, manufacturing

Eder, Julia; Schneider, Etienne

Progressive Industrial Policy – A Remedy for Europe!?

Sprache: ENGLISHSeiten: 108-142https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-34-3-108
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

Since the global economic and financial crisis, industrial policy has enjoyed a stunning revival. In the face of the structural imbalances in the European Union, different sides have proposed industrial policy as a way to overcome the crisis and to reduce unequal development. Left forces elaborated concepts of ‘progressive’ industrial policy, mainly with a post-Keynesian orientation. However, does this orientation make industrial policy genuinely progressive? After introducing the key rationales and proposals, this paper makes three specific contributions to the lively current debate on progressive industrial policy: (1) adding the dimension of politics, power relations and hegemony to the discussion of progressive industrial policy; (2) starting the process of substantiating buzzwords of the current debate, such as ecological sustainability, labour and democratic participation, and gender-sensitivity and (3) taking into account the question of core-periphery relations within the EU and what can be learned from debates on the Global South. We conclude that progressive industrial policy may constitute a remedy for Europe, but that the development of a genuinely progressive industrial policy on a regional scale faces multiple difficulties. In many respects, the national and sub-regional level still seems to leave more room for manoeuvre than on the EU level.

Aulenbacher, Brigitte (2010): Arbeit und Geschlecht – Perspektiven der Geschlechterforschung. In: Aulenbacher, Brigitte et al. (Hg.): Soziologische Geschlechterforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92045-0_8

 

Austrian Chamber of Labour (AK)/Austrian Trade Union Confederation (ÖGB) (2015): Industriepolitik für Beschäftigung und langfristigen Wohlstand. Der Blick der ArbeitnehmerInnen auf den produzierenden Sektor in Österreich. Position Paper, June 2015. https://media.arbeiterkammer.at/PDF/Industriekonzept_23.6.2015.pdf, 7.12.2016.

 

ALBA-TCP (2009): Action Plan for Trade Development in the Joint Development Economic Zone of the ALBA-TCP. http://alba-tcp.org/en/contenido/actionplan-economic-zone-alba-tcp, 29.08.2016.

 

Ambroziak, Adam A. (ed., 2017): The New Industrial Policy of the European Union. Contributions to Economics. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

 

Amin, Samir (1981): Some Thoughts on Self-reliant Development, Collective Selfreliance and the New International Economic Order. In: Grassman, Sven/Lundberg, Erik (eds.): The World Economic Order: Past & Prospects. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 534-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16488-2_16

 

Barrientos, Stephanie/Gereffi, Gary/Rossi, Arianna (2011): Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world. In: International Labour Review 150(3–4), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00119.x

 

Becker, Joachim (2006): Metamorphosen der regionalen Integration. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 22(2), 11-44. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-22-2-11

 

Becker, Joachim/ Jäger, Johannes (2010): Development Trajectories in the Crisis in Europe. In: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 18(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09651561003732488

 

Becker, Joachim (2012): Blindstellen: ungleiche Entwicklung und ungleiche Mobilisierung in der EU. In: Prokla 42(3), 467-476. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v42i168.303

 

Becker, Joachim/Jäger, Johannes/Weissenbacher, Rudy (2015): Uneven and dependent development in Europe. The crisis and its implications. In: Jäger, Johannes/Springler, Elisabeth (ed.): Asymmetric Crisis in Europe and Possible Futures: Critical Political Economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.

 

Benatouil, Maxime (2017): No alternative politics of European integration without a progressive European industrial policy. In: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (ed.): Progressive Industrial Policy for the EU? Outmanoeuvring Neoliberalism. Brussel: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels, 17-24.

 

Beigel, Fernanda (2015): Das Erbe des lateinamerikanischen Dependentismo und die Aktualität des Begriffs der Abhängigkeit. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 31(3), 11-38. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-31-3-11

 

Binder, Manfred/ Jänicke, Martin/ Petschow, Ulrich (eds., 2001): Green Industrial Restructuring. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

 

Bieler, Andreas (2014): Transnational Labour Solidarity in (the) Crisis. In: Global Labour Journal 5 (2), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v5i2.1154

 

Bieling, Hans-Jürgen/ Brand, Ulrich (2015): Competitiveness or Emancipation? Rethinking Regulation and (Counter-)Hegemony in Times of Capitalist Crisis. In: Albritton, Robert/Badeen, Dennis/ Westra, Richard (ed.): The Future of Capitalism After the Financial Crisis. The Varieties of Capitalism Debate in the Age of Austerity. London: Routledge, 184-204.

 

Blöcker, Antje (2014): Arbeit und Innovationen für den sozial-ökologischen Umbau in Industriebetrieben. Düsseldorf: Hans Böckler Stiftung.

 

Brand, Ulrich (2016): Transformation as a New Critical Orthodoxy. The Strategic Use of the Term Transformation Does Not Prevent Multiple Crises. In: GAIA 25/1(2016), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.7

 

Brand, Ulrich/ Wissen, Markus (2014): Strategies of a Green Economy, contours of a Green Capitalism. In: Van der Pijl, Kees (ed.): Handbook of the International Political Economy of Production. Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 508-523.

 

Buch-Hansen, Hubert/ Wigger, Angela (2011): The Politics of European Competition Regulation: A Critical Political Economy Perspective. RIPE Series in Global Political Economy. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828526

 

Buczko, Christina/Hinterberger, Fritz (2017): Progressive industrial policy and the challenge of socio-ecological transformation. In: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (ed.): Progressive Industrial Policy for the EU? Outmanoeuvring Neoliberalism. Brussel: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels, 25-36.

 

Candeias, Mario (2011): Konversion – Einstieg in einer öko-sozialistische Reproduktionsökonomie. In: Candeias, Mario/ Rilling, Rainer/ Röttger, Bernd/ Thimmel, Stefan (eds.): Globale Ökonomie des Autos. Mobilität, Arbeit, Konversion. Hamburg: VSA, 253-274.

 

Chang, Ha-Joon (2013): Comments on “Comparative Advantage: The Silver Bullet of Industrial Policy” by Justin Lin and Célestin Monga. In: Stiglitz, Joseph E./Lin, Justin (eds.): The Industrial Policy Revolution I. The Role of Government Beyond Ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_3

 

Chang, Ha-Joon/ Andreoni, Antonio (2016): Industrial Policy in a Changing World: Basic Principles, Neglected Issues and New Challenges. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 Years Conference. Cambridge.

 

Chang, Ha-Joon/ Grabel, Ilene (2004): Reclaiming Development. An Alternative Economic Policy Manual. London/New York: Zed Books.

 

Chassany, Anne-Sylvaine (2017): Macron wants tougher EU on trade and foreign investment. In: Financial Times, 11.05.2017. https://www.ft.com/content/38e98f94-359b-11e7-99bd-13beb0903fa3, 18.01.2018.

 

Cimoli, Mario/ Dosi, Giovanni Dosi/ Stiglitz, Joseph E. (eds., 2008): Industrial Policy and Development. The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Council of the European Union (2017): Europäische Verteidigung: Rat legt Standpunkt zur vorgeschlagenen Verordnung zur Einrichtung des Europäischen Programms zur industriellen Entwicklung im Verteidigungsbereich (EDIDP) fest. Press Release. 12.12.2017. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/press/press-releases/2017/12/12/european-defence-council-agrees-its-position-on-the-proposed-regulation-establishing-the-european-defence-industrial-development-programme-edidp/pdf, 13.01.2017.

 

Demirović, Alex (2007): Demokratie in der Wirtschaft. Positionen, Probleme, Perspektiven. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

 

Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB) (2012): A Marshall Plan for Europe. Proposal by the DGB for an economic stimulus, investment and development programme for Europe. Berlin.

 

Diem25 (n.d.): The EU will be democratised. Or it will disintegrate! Manifesto.

 

Durand, Cédric (2017): Toward a Progressive Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels. http://www.rosalux.eu/publications/global-progressive-industrial-policy-an-alternative-for-more-social-justice/?tx_wwcore_pagelist%5Bevent%5D=&tx_wwcore_pagelist%5Baction%5D=show&tx_wwcore_pagelist%5Bcontroller%5D=Page&cHash=ac4857123b7ae7db1aa4613af412e4d8, 02.01.2018.

 

Eder, Julia Theresa (2016): Trade and Productive Integration in ALBA-TCP – A systematic comparison with the corresponding agendas of COMECON and NAM. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 32(3), 91-112. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-32-3-91

 

EuroMemorandum (2017): The European Union: The Threat of Disintegration. http://www2.euromemorandum.eu/uploads/euromemorandum_2017.pdf, 2.9.2017.

 

Europe 2020 (2010): A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.

 

European Commission (2014a): For a European Industrial Renaissance. Brussels.

 

European Commission (2014b): Statistical Data on Women Entrepreneurs in Europe. Brussels.

 

European Commission (2017a): Investing in a smart, innovative and sustainable Industry. A renewed EU Industrial Policy Strategy. Brussels.

 

European Commission (2017b): Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Industrial Development Programme aiming at supporting the competitiveness and innovative capacity of the EU defence industry. COM(2017)294, 7.6.2017, 2017/0125 (COD). Brussels.

 

European Parliament (2017): Europe as a stronger global actor. European defence industrial development programme. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-europe-as-a-stronger-global-actor/file-european-defence-industrial-development-programme, 18.01.2018.

 

European Trade Union Federation (ETUC) (2011): Resolution on Industrial policies and worker participation. Brussels: ETUC.

 

European Trade Union Federation (ETUC) (2015): Climate change, the new industrial policies and ways out of the crisis. Brussels: ETUC.

 

European Trade Union Congress (ETUC) (2017): ETUC position paper. A renewed EU industrial policy – ETUC reaction. Brussels: ETUC.

 

Evans, Peter (1995): Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

 

Fischer, Karin (2016): Collective self-reliance: failed idea or still a valuable contribution worth considering? Conference Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304019955_Collective_self-reliance_failed_idea_or_still_a_valuable_contribution_worth_considering, 5.9.2017.

Galtung, Johan (1983): Self-Reliance: Beiträge zu einer alternativen Entwicklungsstrategie. Munich: Minerva.

 

Gauthier, Elisabeth/Benatouil, Maxime (2014): Left Industrial Policy. Productive Transformation for Europe. Vienna: transform! Report.

 

Hirschel, Dierk/ Schulten, Thorsten (2011): Mit Wirtschaftsdemokratie aus der Krise? Gewerkschaftliche Debatten über einen notwendigen Kurswechsel nach der Krise. In: Meine, Hartmut/Schumann, Michael/Urban, Hans-Jürgen (eds.), Mehr Wirtschaftsdemokratie wagen! Hamburg: VSA, 86–97.

 

Holman, Otto (1996): Integrating Southern Europe. EC Expansion and the Transnationalization of Spain. London: Routledge.

 

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2017): Employment by sector -- ILO modelled estimates, May 2017. www.ilo.org/ilostat-files/Documents/Excel/MBI_33_EN.xlsx, 16.01.2018.

 

IPCC (2014): Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Geneva.

International Trade Union Federation (ITUC) (2016): ITUC Statement to the 14th UNCTAD Conference. https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/ituc_statement_to_the_14th_unctad_conference_en.pdf, 20.4.2017.

 

Jackson, Tim (2009): Prosperity Without Growth. Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Sterling, VA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338

 

Jessop, Bob (2012): Dynamics of Regionalism and Globalism: A Critical Political Economy Perspective. http://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/re/k-rsc/hss/book/pdf/vol05_02.pdf, 17.12.2016.

 

Khan, Khushi M. (1978): “Collective Self-Reliance” als Entwicklungsstrategie für die Dritte Welt. In: Khan, Khushi M./Matthies, Volker (eds.): Collective Self-Reliance: Programme und Perspektiven der Dritten Welt. München/London: Weltforum Verlag, 1-26.

 

Khan, Mushtaq (2010): “Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.

 

Komlosy, Andrea (2017): Karneval der Geopolitik. Das Zentrum verordnet sich Protektion. In: Kurswechsel 3, 26-41.

 

Kucera, David/Tejani, Sheba (2014): Feminization, Defeminization, and Structural Change in Manufacturing. In: World Development 64, 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.033

 

Landesmann, Michael/Stöllinger, Roman (2018): Structural Change, Trade and Global Production Networks: An ‘Appropriate Industrial Policy’ for Peripheral and Catching-Up Economies. Wiiw Policy Notes and Reports, No. 21, May 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.04.001

 

López Hernández, Isidro/Rodriguez, Emmanuel (2010): The Spanish Model. In: New Left Review 54(69), 5-29.

 

Lütkenhorst, Wilfried/ Altenburg, Tilman/ Pegels, Anna/ Vidican,Georgeta (2014): Green Industrial Policy: Managing Transformation under Uncertainty. Bonn: Discussion Paper Deutsches Institut Für Entwicklungspolitik, 28/2014.

 

Mamede, Ricardo/Mira Godinho, Manuel/Corado Simões, Vítor (2014): Assessment and challenges of industrial policies in Portugal. In: Teixeira, Aurora A. C./ Silva, Ester/ Mamede, Ricardo (eds.): Structural Change, Competitiveness and Industrial Policy. Painful lessons from the European periphery. London: Routledge, 258-277.

 

Nachtwey, Oliver (2017): Die Abstiegsgesellschaft. Über das Aufbegehren in der regressiven Moderne. 6. Auflage. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag, 181-233.

 

Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) (1976): Aktionsprogramm für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit. Fünfte Konferenz der Staats- und Regierungschefs der blockfreien Länder in Colombo, August 1976. In: Khan, Khushi M./Matthies, Volker (eds., 1978): Collective Self-Reliance: Programme und Perspektiven der Dritten Welt. München/London: Weltforum Verlag, 171-194.

 

Nübler, Irmgard (2011): Industrial Policies and Capabilities for Catching up: Frameworks and Paradigms. ILO Employment Working Paper No. 77. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

 

Opratko, Benjamin (2014): Hegemonie. Politische Theorie nach Antonio Gramsci. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

 

Pianta, Mario/Lucchese, Matteo/Nascia, Leopoldo (2016): What is to be produced? The making of a new industrial policy in Europe. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels.

 

Plank, Leonhard/ Staritz, Cornelia (2013): Renaissance der Industriepolitik – Irr- oder Königsweg? In: Kurswechsel 3/2013: 74–91.

 

Poulantzas, Nicos (1978 [1974]): Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: Verso.

Poulantzas, N. (2000 [1978): State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.

 

Prebisch, Raúl (1974): Informe reservado al Secretario General de las Naciones Unidas sobre los recursos excedentes del petróleo y el Nuevo Orden Económico Mundial http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/32934, 7.8.2017.

 

Ramírez Pérez, Sgfrido/ Benatouil, Maxime (2014): From Industrial Policy to a European Productive Reconstruction. Vienna: transform!europe Discussion Paper No. 3.

 

Raza, Werner/Staritz, Cornelia/Grumiller, Jan (2016): Framework to Assess Institutional Setups for Industrial Policies. Vienna: Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE).

 

Rehfeld, Dieter/ Dankbaar, Ben (2015): Industriepolitik. Theoretische Grundlagen, Varianten und Herausforderungen. In: WSI-Mitteilungen 7/2015, 491-499.

 

Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (2017) (ed.): Progressive Industrial Policy for the EU? Outmanoeuvring Neoliberalism. Brussels: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels Office.

 

Rodrik, Dani (2008): Normalizing Industrial Policy. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper Nr. 3.

 

Rodrik, Dani (2014): Green Industrial Policy. In: Oxford Review of Economic Policy 30 (3), 469–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru025

 

Röttger, Bernd (2011): Betriebliche Konversion. In: Candeias, Mario/ Rilling, Rainer/ Röttger, Bernd/ Thimmel, Stefan (eds.): Globale Ökonomie des Autos. Mobilität. Arbeit. Konversion. Hamburg: VSA, 241-252.

 

Sablowski, Thomas (2010a) Widersprüche innerhalb der Bourgeoisie und der Staat bei Poulantzas. In: Demirovic, Alex/ Adolphs, Stephan/Karakayali, Serhat (eds.): Das Staatsverständnis von NicosPoulantzas. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845221038-189

 

Sablowski, Thomas (2010b): Konsumnorm, Konsumweise. In: Historisch-Kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus 7/II. Hamburg: Argument Verlag, 1642-1654.

 

Sablowski, Thomas/ Schneider, Etienne/ Syrovatka, Felix (2018): Zehn Jahre Krise. Regulation des Lohnverhältnisses und ungleiche Entwicklung in der Europäischen Union. In: Prokla 48(3), forthcoming.

 

Sandbeck, Sune/ Schneider, Etienne (2014): From the Sovereign Debt Crisis to Authoritarian Statism: Contradictions of the European State Project. In: New Political Economy 19(6), 847-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.861411

 

Schmalz, Stefan/Dörre, Klaus (2014): Der Machtressourcenansatz: Ein Instrument zur Analyse gewerkschaftlichen Handlungsvermögens. In: Industrielle Beziehungen 21(3), 217-237.

 

Schneider, Etienne (2017): Raus aus dem Euro – rein in die Abhängigkeit? Perspektiven und Grenzen alternativer Wirtschaftspolitik außerhalb des Euro. Hamburg: VSA.

 

Schneider, Etienne/Syrovatka, Felix (2017): Die Zukunft der europäischen Wirtschaftsintegration. Blockierte und wachsende Asymmetrie zwischen Deutschland und Frankreich. In: Prokla 47(4), 653-673. https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v47i189.62

 

Secchi, Carlo (1982): Impact on the Less Developed Regions of the EEC. In: Seers, Dudley/ Vaitsos, Constantin/ Kiljunen, Marja-Liisa (eds.): The Second Enlargement of the EEC. The Integration of Unequal Partners. London/Basingstoke, 176- 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16760-9_10

 

Seguino, Stephanie/ Berik, Günseli/ Meulen Rogers, Yana van der (2010): An Investment that pays off. Promoting Gender Equality as a Means to Finance Development. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. http://www.gendermatters.eu/resources_documents/UserFiles/File/Resourse/Promoting_gender_equality_as_a_means_to_finance_development.pdf, 25.4.2017.

 

Stiglitz, Joseph E., Justin Yifu Lin, and Celestin Monga. (2013): The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy. Washington: The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6628. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6628

 

Strategic Green Industrial Policy (SGIP) (2016): Practitioner’s Guide. UNEP, ILO, UNDP, UNIDO, UNITAR.

 

Tejani, Sheba/Milberg, William (2016): Global Defeminization? Industrial Upgrading and Manufacturing Employment in Developing Countries. In: Feminist Economics 22(2), 24-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1120880

 

Thie, Hans (2013): ‚Mehr Industriepolitik‘ ist im ökologischen Zeitalter die falsche Formel. In: Kurswechsel 3/2013, 86-91.

 

transform!europe (2015): Towards Europe’s Productive Transformation – an Emergency For an Alternative Industrial Policy. Vienna: transform! Discussion Paper 1/2015.

 

Troost, Axel (2017): Industrial policy for Europe – a topic for the political left? In: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation (ed.): Progressive Industrial Policy for the EU? Outmanoeuvring Neoliberalism. Brussel: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Brussels, 77-84.

 

UNIDO (2015): Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women Strategy, 2016-2019. https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/PMO/GC.16/GC.16_8_E_Gender_Equality_and_Empowerment_of_Women_Strategy__2016-2019.pdf, 5.1.2018.

 

Vilmar, Fritz/Satller, Karl-Otto (1978): Wirtschaftsdemokratie und Humanisierung der Arbeit. Systematische Integration der wichtigsten Konzepte. Köln/Frankfurt am Main: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.

 

Warwick, Ken (2013): Beyond Industrial Policy. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.

 

Whitfield, Lindsay/ Therkildsen, Ole/ Buur, Lars/ Kjaer, Anne Mette (2015): The Politics of African Industrial Policy. A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316225509

 

Zinn, Karl Georg (1976): Investitionskontrollen und –planung. In: Sarrazin, Thilo (ed.): Investitionslenkung. „Spielwiese“ oder „vorausschauende Industriepolitik“? Bonn/Bad Godesberg, 15-24.

progressive industrial policy, Euro crisis, uneven European development, social-ecological transformation

Sonderegger, Arno

Mandelas Hunderter

Sprache: DEUTSCHSeiten: 173-183https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-34-3-173
  • Abstract

Review-Essay:

 

Stephan Bierling: Nelson Mandela: Rebell, Häftling, Präsident. München: C.H. Beck, 2018.

Kontakt
Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik
an den österreichischen Universitäten
Sensengasse 3
1090 Wien, Österreich

T +43 1 317 40 17
E office@mattersburgerkreis.at
Abonnieren Sie unseren Newsletter
© 2015 Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten | Impressum
Darstellung:
https://www.mattersburgerkreis.at/