• 1.bestellen
  • 2.Warenkorb ändern
  • 3.zur Kassa gehen
Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 61-87https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-1-67
Steuer, Benjamin

Governing China's Informal Waste Collectors under Xi Jinping: Aligning Interests to Yield Effective Outcomes


The present article analyses the changing relationship between the Chinese government on the one hand and informal waste collectors and
pre-processors on the other. Over time, the modes of engagement have varied considerably, and since Xi Jinping’s tenure as president, the approach of central and local governments has taken a surprising turn: instead of forcefully incorporating informal actors, new collection schemes appear to provide more latitude to informal actors. While the schemes feature formal characteristics, e.g. uniform logos, attire and machinery, daily operations are individually organised by informal actors. Based on a model of institutional evolution, this article argues that the hereby improved effectiveness in the domain of waste collection results from formal institutional solutions that sufficiently address the interests of all involved stakeholders.



Artikel (digital)

Andere Artikel in dieser Ausgabe
Fuchs, Daniel; Wenten, Frido

Development Models and Environmental Governance under Xi Jinping

Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 4-9https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-1-4
  • Abstract
  • Literatur


Andrews-Speed, Philip (2012): The Governance of Energy in China. Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284037

Arrighi, Giovanni (2008): Adam Smith in Beijing. Lineages of the 21st Century. London/New York: Verso.

Au, Loong-Yu (2012): China’s Rise. Strength and Fragility. Pontypool: Merlin Press.

Deng, Yanhua/Yang, Guobin (2013): Pollution and Protest in China: Environmental Mobilization in Context. In: The China Quarterly 214, 321-336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741013000659

Economy, Elizabeth (2010): The River Runs Black: The Environmental Challenge to China’s Future. 2nd Edition. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Eaton, Sarah/Kostka, Genia (2017): Central Protectionism in China: the ‘central SOE problem’ in environmental governance. In: The China Quarterly 231, 685-704. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000881

Fligstein, Neil/Zhang, Jianjun (2011): A New Agenda for Research on the Trajectory of Chinese Capitalism. In: Management and Organization Review 7 (1), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00169.x

Fuchs, Daniel/Wenten, Frido (2019): China’s Political Economy under Xi Jinping – The Beginning of a ‘New Era’? In: Austrian Journal of Development Studies 35 (4), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-35-3-4

Heilmann, Sebastian (2008): Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise. In: Studies in Comparative International Development 43, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9014-4

Huang, Yasheng (2008): Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Entrepreneurship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kostka, Genia/Nahm, Jonas (2017): Central-Local Relations: Recentralization and Environmental Governance in China. In: The China Quarterly 231, 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017001011

Kostka, Genia/Zhang, Chunman (2018): Tightening the grip: environmental governance under Xi Jinping. In: Environmental Politics 27 (5), 769-781. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1491116

Kroeber, Arthur R. (2016): China’s Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Liebman, Benjamin L./Milhaupt, Curtis J. (Eds.) (2015): Regulating the Visible Hand? The Institutional Implications of Chinese Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190250256.001.0001

Long, Zhiming/Herrera, Rémy/Andréani, Tony (2018): On the Nature of the Chinese Economic System. In Monthly Review 70 (5), https://monthlyreview.org/2018/10/01/on-the-nature-of-the-chinese-economic-system/, 10.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-070-05-2018-09_4

Ma, Tianjie (2019): How Green is China? In: New Internationalist, https://newint.org/features/2019/10/16/how-green-china, 10.1.2020.

McNally, Christopher A. (2019): Theorizing Sino-Capitalism: implications for the study of comparative capitalism. In: Contemporary Politics 25 (3), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2018.1553125

Mol, Carter P.J./Carter, Neil T. (2006): China’s environmental governance in transition. In: Environmental Politics 15 (2), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010600562765

Ran, Ran (2017): Understanding blame politics in China’s decentralized system of environmental governance: actors, strategies and context. In: The China Quarterly 231, 634-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000911

Steinhardt, Christoph H./Wu, Fengshi (2016): In the Name of the Public: Environmental Protest and the Changing Landscape of Popular Contention in China. In: The China Journal 75, 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1086/684010

Sternfeld, Eva (2017): Introduction. In: Sternfeld, Eva (Ed.): Routledge Handbook of Environmental Policy in China. London/New York: Routledge, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315736761-1

ten Brink, Tobias (2019): China’s Capitalism. A Paradoxical Route to Economic Prosperity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812295795

Wang, Hui (2004): The Year 1989 and the Historical Roots of Neoliberalism in China. In: Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 12 (1), 7-69. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-12-1-7

Wemheuer, Felix (2019): Chinas große Umwälzung. Soziale Konflikte und Aufstieg im Weltsystem. Köln: PapyRossa.


Roberts, Michael

China: Three Models Of Development

Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 10-39https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-1-10
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

In the past 40 years, China’s growth has been phenomenal. And, since the global financial crisis and the Great Recession in the major capitalist economies, China has continued to close the output gap with the leading capitalist economies. Will China continue to catch up in the next 40 years or will it suffer the fate of the so-called ‘middle income trap’ experienced by other ‘emerging’ economies? The article considers three possible models of development as offered by, respectively neoclassical growth theory; Keynesianstyle forced investment; and a Marxian model based on the law of value and profitability. The neoclassical model highlights China’s comparative advantage of cheap and plentiful labour; the Keynesian model concentrates on the role of China’s high investment ratio; the Marxist model emphasises China’s exceptional restriction of the law of value in capitalist production: or what might be termed, ‘socialism with Chinese characteristics’.

Agénor, Pierre-Richard/Canuto, Otaviano/ Jelenic, Michael (2012): Avoiding
Middle-Income Growth Traps. The World Bank. Economic Premise 98, 1-7.
www.worldbank.org/economicpremise, 24.2.2020.

Amin, Samir (2013): China 2013. In: Monthly Review 64(10), 14-33. https://doi.

Arrighi, Giovanni (2009): Adam Smith in Beijing. Lineages of the Twenty-First
Century. London: Verso.

Bai, Chong-En/Hsieh, Chang-Tai/Qian Yingyi (2006): The Return to Capital
in China. NBER Working Paper Series 12755. https://www.nber.org/papers/
w12755, 22.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12755

Belsie, Laurent (2020): China’s State Sector: Transformed, but Not So Privatized.
The National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/digest/
jun15/w21006.html, 24.2.2020.

Bloomberg (2018): China Invites Foreign Cash to Build a World-Class Chip
Industry. https://www.industryweek.com/economy/china-invites-foreign-cashbuild-
world-class-chip-industry, 22.1.2020.

Cherif, Reda/Hasanov, Fuad (2019): The Return of the Policy That Shall Not Be
Named: Principles of Industrial Policy. IMF Working Paper 19/74. https://doi.

China Briefing (2018): The Robotics Industry in China. https://www.china-briefing.
com/news/chinas-robot-industry/, 22.1.2020.

Chow, Nathan (2018): Understanding China Automation drive is essential and
welcome. The Development Bank of Singapore (DBS). https://www.dbs.com/
pdf, 24.2.2020.

Dabla-Norris, Era/Ho, Giang/Kochhar, Kalpana/Kyobe, Annettee/Tchaidze,
Robert (2013): Anchoring Growth: The Importance of Productivity-Enhancing
Reforms in Emerging Market and Developing Economies. IMF Staff Discussion
Note. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2013/sdn1308.pdf,
22.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616357290.006

Domar, Evsey D. (1946): Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment. In:
Econometrica 14(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.2307/1905364

Fan, Joseph/Morck, Randall/Yeung, Bernard (2011): Capitalizing China. NBER
Working Paper Series 17687. https://www.nber.org/papers/w17687, 22.1.2020.

Gaulard, Mylène (2018): The Chinese Economic Crisis: A Marxist Approach. In:
Carchedi, Guglielmo/Roberts, Michael (eds.): World in Crisis. A Global Analysis
of Marx’s Law of Profitability. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 279-295.

Gao Xu (2010): State-owned enterprises in China: How big are they?
big-are-they, 24.02.2020.

Gulzuade, Amir (2019): Explained, the role of China‘s state-owned companies.
World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/05/
why-chinas-state-owned-companies-still-have-a-key-role-to-play/, 24.02.2020.

Harrod, Roy F. (1939): An Essay in Dynamic Theory. In: The Economic Journal
49(193), 14-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/2225181

Harvey, David (2005): A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University

Herrera, Rémy/Long, Zhiming (2014): Capital accumulation, profit rates and cycles
in China from 1952 to 2014: lessons from the evolution of Chinese industry. In:
Journal of Innovation Economics and Management 2(23), 59-82. https://doi.

Hsieh, Chang-Tai/Song, Zheng (2015): Grasp the Large, Let Go of the Small: The
Transformation of the State Sector in China. NBER Working Paper Series 21006.
https://www.nber.org/papers/w21006, 22.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21006


IMF (2017): Estimating the stock of public capital in 170 countries. https://www.
imf.org/external/np/fad/publicinvestment/pdf/csupdate_jan17.pdf, 22.1.2020.
Lardy, Nicholas R. (2019): The State Strikes Back. The End of Economic Reform in
China? Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Lewis, Arthur W. (1954): Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of
Labor. In: Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22(2), 139-91.

Li, Tao (2019): Who controls Huawei? Chinese telecom leader’s ownership structure
explained in more detail. In: South China Morning Post, 26.4.2019. https://www.scmp.com/tech/tech-leaders-and-founders/article/3007863/whocontrols-
huawei-chinese-telecom-leaders, 22.1.2020.

Lin, Justin Yifu (2012): Demystifying the Chinese Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, Zhiming/Herrera, Rémy (2016): Building Original Series of Physical Capital
Stocks for China’s Economy. Methodological Problems, Proposals for Solutions
and a New Database. In: China Economic Review 40(9), 33-53. https://

Long, Zhiming/Herrera, Rémy/Andréani, Tony (2018): On the Nature of the
Chinese Economic System. In: Monthly Review 70(5), 32-43. https://doi.

Magnus, George (2018): Red Flags. Why Xi’s China is in Jeopardy. New Haven/
London: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5cgbb7

Maito, Esteban Ezequiel (2018): The Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall since
the Nineteenth Century and a World Rate of Profit. In: Carchedi, Guglielmo/
Roberts, Michael (eds.): World in Crisis. A Global Analysis of Marx’s Law of
Profitability. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 129-150.

McGregor, James (2010): China’s Drive for ‘Indigenous Innovation’ – A Web of
Industrial Policies. https://www.uschamber.com/report/china%E2%80%99sdrive-
indigenous-innovation-web-industrial-policies, 22.1.2020.

McGregor, Richard (2019): How the state runs business in China. In: The
Guardian, 25.7.2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/25/

Milhaupt, Curtis J./Zheng, Wentong (2016): Why Mixed-Ownership Reforms
Cannot Fix China’s State Sector. Paulson Policy Memorandum. http://www.
Milhaupt-and-Zheng_English_R.pdf, 22.1.2020.

Milhaupt, Curtis J./Zheng, Wentong (2015): Beyond Ownership: State Capitalism
and the Chinese Firm. In: The Georgetown Law Journal 103(3), 665-722.
National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (NBSC) (2017):
China Statistical Yearbook 2017.

Panitch, Leo/Gindin, Sam (2013): The Integration of China into Global Capitalism.
In: International Critical Thought 3(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159828

Phillips, Tom (2017): Xi Jinping heralds ‘new era’ of Chinese power at Communist
party congress. In: The Guardian, 18.10.2017. https://www.theguardian.com/

Qi, Hua (2018): The historical peak of the rate of surplus value and the “new
normal” of the Chinese economy: a political economy analysis. In: Revista de
Economia Contemporânea 22(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/198055272212

Qu, Hongbin/Wang, Julia/Sun, Junwel (2013): China Inside Out. Return on
Capital: Perception vs. Reality. Hong Kong: HSBC Global Research. Roberts,
Michael (2009): The Great Recession: Profit Cycles, Economic Crisis – A
Marxist View. London: Lulu.

Roberts, Michael (2018a): Marx 200 – a review of Marx’s economics 200 years after
his birth. London: Lulu.

Roberts, Michael (2018b): Trump, trade and the tech war. https://thenextrecession.
wordpress.com/2018/04/04/trump-trade-and-the-tech-war/, 22.1.2020.

Ross, John (2013): China has overtaken the US to become the world’s largest industrial
producer. https://ablog.typepad.com/keytrendsinglobalisation/2013/09/
china-has-overtaken-the-us.html, 22.1.2020.

Ross, John (2014): Deng Xiaoping & John Maynard Keynes. https://www.learningfromchina.
net/deng-xiaoping-john-maynard-keynes/, 22.1.2020.

Santacreu, Ana Maria/Peake, Makenzie (2019): China’s Innovation and
Global Technology Diffusion. In: Economic Synopses, Federal Reserve
Bank of St. Louis, https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/economicsynopses/
22.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.20955/es.2019.7

Shaikh, Anwar (2016): Capitalism. Competition, Conflict, Crises.
New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof

Solow, Robert M. (1957): Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.
In: Review of Economics and Statistics 39(3), 312-320. https://doi.

Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2017): Globalization and its Discontents Revisited. Anti-Globalization
in the Era of Trump. London/New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Stratfor Worldview (2018): State-Owned Enterprises Are a Hard Habit China
Doesn’t Want to Break. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/state-ownedenterprises-
are-hard-habit-china-doesnt-want-break, 22.1.2020.

Szamosszegi, Andrew/Kyle, Cole (2011): An Analysis of State-Owned Enterprises
and State Capitalism in China. https://www.uscc.gov/research/analysis-stateowned-
enterprises-and-state-capitalism-china, 22.1.2020.

UNCTAD – United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2017): World
Investment Report 2017: Investment and the Digital Economy. https://unctad.
org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2017_en.pdf, 24.02.2020.

Vu, Minh Khuong (2013): The Dynamics of Economic Growth. Policy Insights
from Comparative Analyses in Asia. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward
Elgar. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae31-3i

Walter, Carl E./Fraser, Howie (2011): Red Capitalism. The Fragile Financial Foundation
of China’s Extraordinary Rise. Singapore: Wiley & Sons. https://doi.

Wen, Tiejun (2001): Centenary reflections on the ‘three dimensional problem’
of rural China. In: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 2(2), 287-295. https://doi.

Woodward, Jude (2017): The US vs. China: Asia’s new Cold War? Manchester:
Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7228/manche

World Bank (2013a): World Bank Development Indicators per Capita – GDP
Growth Rate 1961-2020. https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/CHN/china/
gdp-growth-rate’>China, 10.10.2019.

World Bank (2013b): China 2030: Building a Modern, Harmonious, and Creative
Society. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/
China-2030-complete.pdf, 22.1.2020. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821395455_

World Bank (2019): Innovative China: New Drivers of Growth. http://documents.
Drivers-of-Growth, 22.1.2020.

World Bank (2020): World Bank Development Indicators: Growth per Capita
– GDP Series. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.
CD?locations=CN, 24.2.2020.

World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) (2019): Global Innovation Index 2019,
https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2019/article_0008.html, 22.1.2020.

World Trade Organization (2019): World Trade Statistical Review 2019, https://www.

China, models, Keynes, Marx, Neoclassical

Marinaccio, Julia

Banning Logging, Conserving Legitimacy: Large-Scale Ecological Restoration under Xi Jinping

Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 40-60https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-1-40
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

“Organizational ideology” (Schurmann 1968) continues to be constitutive in contemporary Chinese politics. The issue of the urgency of coherence between values and action shapes decision-making and how the leadership conveys its decisions to the public. The case study of the recent logging ban in natural forests shows that the policy sends symbolic messages of political will and regime capacity to reconcile conflicting interests of development. The official propaganda turns it into a signature policy of Xi Jinping while constructing the path-dependency of party-rule and attempts to substantiate future projections with empirical data from the past. Nevertheless, the policy is contested among experts and also bears political risks.

Beck, Lindsay (2007): Chinese slogans mark Hu era. http://uk.reuters.com/

Beetham, David (1991): The Legitimation of Power. Houndsmills: MacMillan.

Buonocuore, Mauro (2019): Storytelling is Part of the Solution to the Climate
Dilemma. https://www.climateforesight.eu/future-hearth/storytelling-is-partof-
the-solution-to-the-climate-dilemma, 24.5.2019.

Cao Huiming/Tang, Mingfang/Deng, Hongbing/Dong, Rencai (2014): Analysis
of management effectiveness of natural reserves in Yunnan Province, China.
In: International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 21(1),
77-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.786764

China Daily (2013): GDP is not the only measure. http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/
opinion/2013-07/03/content_16719776.htm, 18.10.2019.

Davis, Gloria (2015): Destiny’s Mixed Metaphors. In: Barmé, Gremie R./ Jaivin,
Linda/ Goldkorn, Jeremy (eds.): Shared Destiny. Series: The China Yearbook
2014. Canberra: ANU Press, 150-170. https://doi.org/10.22459/CSY.11.2015.04

Demurgér, Sylvie/Fournier, Martin/Shen, Guozhen (2005): Forest Protection
Policies: National Guidelines and their Local Implementation in Northern
Sichuan. In: China Perspectives 59, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.

Ellis, Christopher/Stimson, James A. (2012): Ideology in America. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.

Fewsmith, John (2004): Promoting the Scientific Development Concept. In: China
Leadership Monitor 11, 1-10.

Gao, Wei/Yan, Yan (2012): 习近平:人民对美好生活的向往就是我们的奋斗目标. http://cpc.
people.com.cn/18/n/2012/1116/c350821-19596022.html, 24.5.2019.

Global Witness (2018): 城门鱼殃: 巴布亚新几内亚的非法砍伐对中国林业和国际声誉的影
响. https://www.globalwitness.org/en/reports/major-liability-illegal-loggingpapua-

Göbel, Christian (2019): Social unrest in China: a bird’s eye perspective. In: Wright,
Teresa (ed.): Handbook of Protest and Resistance in China. Elgaronline.

Han, Xiu (2014): 黑龙江两大森工集团全面停止商业性采伐. http://finance.sina.com.cn/
chanjing/gsnews/20140331/093818664407.shtml, 20.10.2019.

Heberer, Thomas/Schubert, Gunter (2012): County and Township Cadres as a Strategic
Group. A New Approach to Political Agency in China’s Local State. In:
Journal of Chinese Political Science 3, 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-

Holbig, Heike (2005): Wissenschaftliches Entwicklungskonzept “, „ Harmonische
Gesellschaft“ und „ Eigenständige Innovation “: Neue parteipolitische Prioritäten
unter Hu Jintao. In: China aktuell 34(6), 13-19.

Holbig, Heike (2018): Whose New Normal? Framing the Economic Slowdown
Under Xi Jinping. In: Journal of Chinese Political Science 23, 341-363. https://

Johnes, Michael D./Peterson, Holly (2017): Narrative Persuasion and Storytelling as
Climate Communication Strategies. Climate Science. Oxford University Press.

Kaufman, Herbert (2006): The Forest Ranger: A study in administrative behavior.
New York: Resources for the Future.

Ke, Zhongjia (2018): 从“采山”到“种参”,生态好转、生活改善: 白建国:我的林子越来越密
(美丽中国·天保20年②). http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/html/2018-04/18/
nw.D110000renmrb_20180418_1-14.htm, 24.5.2019

Kostka, Genia/Nahm, Jonas (2017): Central–Local Relations: Recentralization and
Environmental Governance in China. In: The China Quarterly 231, 567-582.

Kostka, Genia/Zhang, Chunman (2018): Tightening the grip: environmental
governance under Xi Jinping. In: Environmental Politics 27(5), 769–781.

Landesa Rural Development Institute (2012): Summary of 2011 17-Province Survey’s
Findings. https://s24756.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/Landesa_China_
Survey_Report_2011.pdf, 24.5.2019.

Laurence, William (2011): China’s Appetite for Wood Takes a Heavy Toll on
Forests. https://e360.yale.edu/features/chinas_appetite_for_wood_takes_a_
heavy_toll_on_forests, 20.10.2019.

Li, Lianjiang (2004): Political Trust in Rural China. In: Modern China 30(2),
228-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700403261824

Liang, Dan/Mol, Arthur P. (2013): Political Modernization in China’s Forest
Governance? Payment Schemes for Forest Ecological Services in Liaoning. In:
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 15(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.108

Liu, Lican (2018): Ending illegal logging requires China to act. https://www.chinadialogue.

Liu, Qin (2014): China tests outright logging ban in state forests. https://www.
in-state-forests, 24.5.2019.

Liu, Qin (2017): China overhauls its national parks. https://www.chinadialogue.net/
article/show/single/en/10152-China-overhauls-its-national-parks, 18.10.2019.

Liu, Shilei/Xu, Jintao (2019): Livelihood mushroomed: Examining household
level impacts of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) under new management. In: Forest Policy and Economics 98, 44-53.

Long, Kayleigh (2018): Myanmar road corridors threaten land and livelihoods.
threaten-land-and-livelihoods, 24.5.2019

Macqueen, Duncan (2018): Crucial agreement with China could save Mozambique’s
forests. https://www.chinadialogue.net/blog/10772-Crucial-agreementwith-
China-could-save-Mozambique-s-forests/en, 24.5.2019.

Marinaccio, Julia (2018): Training in Austria’s and China’s Forestry Administration:
A Comparison of Human Capital Development. In: International Journal of
Public Administration 41(7), 516-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.12

Marinaccio, Julia (2019): Organizing forestry governance: Cadre training in China’s
multi-level governance regime. In: Journal of Environmental Management 231,
795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.109

Marinelli, Maurizio (2018): How to Build a ‘Beautiful China’ in the Anthropocene.
The Political Discourse and the Intellectual Debate on Ecological Civilization.
In: Journal of Chinese Political Science 23, 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/

Mol, Arthur P./Carter, Neil (2005): China’s Environmental Governance
in Transition. In: Environmental Politics, 15(2), 149–170. https://doi.

NFGA (2018): Forest Resources in China. http://english.forestry.gov.cn/
catid=10&Itemid=134, 24.5.3019.

Noesselt, Nele (2017): Governance Change and Patterns of Continuity: Assessing
China’s “New Normal.” In: Journal of Chinese Political Science 22, 341-355.

O’Brien, Kevin/Li, Lianjiang (1999): Selective Policy Implementation in Rural
China. In: Comparative Politics 31(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/422143

Ong, Sandy/Carver, Edward (2019): The Rosewood Trade: An Illicit Trail from
Forest to Furniture. https://e360.yale.edu/features/the-rosewood-trade-theillicit-
trail-from-forest-to-furniture, 24.5.2019.

Ran, Ran (2017): Understanding Blame Politics in China’s Decentralized System
of Environmental Governance: Actors, Strategies and Context. In: The China
Quarterly 231, 634-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000911

Rooij, van Benjamin/Zhu, Qiaoqiao/Na Li/Wang Qiliang (2017): Centralizing
Trends and Pollution Law Enforcement in China. In: The China Quarterly 231,
583-606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741017000935

Schurmann, Franz (1968): Ideology and Organization in Communist China.
Berkeley: University of California Press.

SFA (2016): 中国林业年鉴 2016. Beijing: China Forestry Press.

SFA (2018): Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2017. Beijing: National Forestry and
Grassland Administration.

Shi, Lin/He Yingchun (2018): 天然林保护,功德无量. http://env.people.com.cn/
n1/2018/0518/c1010-29999974.html, 24.5.2019.

Shi, Miaoying/Qi, Jiaguo/Yin Runsheng (2016): Has China’s Natural Forest Protection
Program Protected Forests?—Heilongjiang’s Experience. In: Forests
7(218), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7100218

Sun, Jian (2016): 孙建博代表:加快森林法修订推动生态文明建设. http://npc.people.com.
cn/n1/2016/0503/c14576-28321110.html, 24.5.2019.

Sun, Xiufang/Canby, Kerstin/Liu Lijun (2016): China’s Logging Ban in Natural
Forests: Impacts of Extended Policy at Home and Abroad. In: Forest Trends
Information Brief (March), 1-8.

Viña, Andrés/McConnell, William J./ Yang, Hongbo/ Xu, Zhenci/ Liu, Jianguo
(2016): Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. In: Science
Advances 2(3), e1500965. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500965

Wang Qiwen/Tang Long (2017): 国家林业局:已全面停止天然林商业性采伐.: http://
ln.people.com.cn/n2/2017/0316/c378326-29864258.html, 24.5.2019.

Wang, Alex (2018): Symbolic Legitimacy and Chinese Environmental Reform. In:
Environmental Law 48(4), 699-760.

Weber, Max (1964): The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York:
Talcott Parsons Free Press.

Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne (2008): The distance between state and rural society
in the PRC. Reading Document No 1 (February 2004). In: Journal of Environmental
Management 87, 216-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.046

Weigelin-Schwiedrzik, Susanne (2018): Doing things with numbers: Chinese
approaches to the Anthropocene. In: International Communication of Chinese
Culture 5(1-2), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40636-018-0115-8

Xiao, Wugang (2017): 国家林业局:中国已全面停止天然林商业性采伐. http://news.sohu.
com/20170316/n483489374.shtml, 24.5.2019.

Xie, Lunyu/Berck, Peter/Xu, Jintao (2016): The effect on forestation of the collective
forest tenure reform in China. In: China Economics Review 38, 116-129.

Xie, Zhenhua (2018): 林区不伐木 发展没停步(绿色焦点). http://society.people.com.cn/
n1/2018/0421/c1008-29940737.html, 30.10.2019.

Xinhua (2017): Xi calls for persistently pursuing Chinese dream of national rejuvenation.
content_32535527.htm, 30.10.2019.

Xu, Jianchu (2011): China’s new forests aren’t as green as they seem. Nature 477, 371.

Xu, Jintao/Yin, Runsheng/Li, Zhou/Liu, Can (2006): China’s ecological rehabilitation:
Unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies.
In: Ecological Economics 57, 595-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

Yang, Hua (2017): China’s Natural Forest Protection Program: Progress and impacts.
In: The Forestry Chronicle 93(2), 113-117. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc2017-017

Yeh, Emilie T. (2009): Greening Western China: A Critical View. In: Geoforum 40,
884-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.06.004

Yin, Beibei (2017): Is your hardwood floor made from illegally sourced wood?
sourced-wood-/en, 24.5.2019.

Yu, Shihang (2017): 广西将全面停止天然林商业性采伐. Retrieved from: http://www.gov.
cn/xinwen/2017-01/05/content_5156966.htm, 24.5.2019.

Yu, Weiya (2014): 李克强“向雾霾宣战”中的民生情怀. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2014-
03/14/content_2638566.htm, 30.10.2019.

Zeng, Jun (2008): 《森林法》修订之探讨. In: Forest Security 4, 34-36.

Zhai, Deli/Xu Jianchu/Dai Zhicong/Cannon, Charles H. (2014): Increasing tree
cover while losing diverse natural forests in tropical Hainan, China. In:
Regional Environmental Change 14(2), 611-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-

Zhang, Ke (2014): 最大林区停伐境外木材依存度料增. http://finance.sina.com.cn/
roll/20140401/013018671043.shtml, 24.5.2019.

Zhang, Qian Forest (2010): Reforming China’s State-Owned Farms: State Farms in
Agrarian Transition. [Paper presented at the Asian Rural Sociology Association
International Conference, Legazpi City, Philippines]. https://ink.library.smu.
edu.sg/soss_research/1089, 20.10.2019.

Zhang, Yu/Li Fang (2017): 停止天然林商业性采伐对黑龙江省地方林业的影响. Protection
Forest Science and Technology 4 (163), 95-96.

Zhao, Shucong (2014): 赵树丛在全面停止重点国有林区天然林商业性采伐电视电话会
议上的讲话. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/4486/20150401/752546.html,

Zheng, Yongnian/Tok, Sow Keat (2007): ‘Harmonious Society’ and ‘Harmonious
World’: China’s Policy Discourse under Hu Jintao. [Briefing Series 26, University
of Nottingham, China Policy Institute]. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/
world.pdf, 20.10.2019.

Zhongfa (2014): 关于全面深化农村改革加快推进农业现代化的若干意见. [Zhongfa 2014,
No.1]. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2014-01-19/181729288658.shtml, 24.5.2019.

Zhongfa (2015): 中共中央 国务院关于加快推进生态文明建设的意见. [Zhongfa 2015,
No. 12]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-05/05/content_2857363.htm,

China, legitimacy, forestry, logging ban, Xi Jinping

Pfeffer, Clemens

Gerhard Hauck: "Was der Entwicklungsforschung als Gegenstand bleibt..."

Sprache: DeutschSeiten: 88-100https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-1-88
  • Abstract
  • Literatur

Der Sozialwissenschafter Gerhard Hauck (* 1939) studierte Ethnologie und Soziologie in Heidelberg und beschäftigt sich seit den frühen 1960er-Jahren mit entwicklungstheoretischen Fragen. Im deutschen Sprachraum zählt er seit vielen Jahrzehnten zum Kreis der wichtigsten KritikerInnen des dominanten Entwicklungsparadigmas. Als transdisziplinärer Grenzgänger überschreitet er konsequent die Schranken institutionalisierter Fachrichtungen und gewinnt etablierten Themengebieten neue Facetten ab. Im Interview schildert Hauck, was ihn ursprünglich zu einer kritischen Beschäftigung mit Entwicklungsfragen bewegte, wie er die Zukunft der Entwicklungsforschung sieht und welche Rolle die Verhandlung von Gerechtigkeits- und Wahrheitsfragen in seinen Werken spielt.

1 Das Interview wurde am 15. Dezember 2016 via Telefon geführt und dabei aufgezeichnet. Die Transkription erfolgte durch Clemens Pfeffer im Herbst 2019.
2 Hauck, Gerhard (1965): Die politischen Führungsschichten in den neuen Staaten Schwarz-Afrikas. Dissertation. Heidelberg: Philosophische Fakultät.
3 Siehe hierzu Hauck, Gerhard (1975): Das Elend der bürgerlichen Entwicklungstheorie. In: Tibi, Bassam/Brandes, Volkhard (Hg.): Handbuch 2: Unterentwicklung. Frankfurt: Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 36-63.
4 Fischer, Karin/Hauck, Gerhard/Boatcă, Manuela (Hrsg., 2016): Handbuch Entwicklungsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
5 Der Begriff homo oeconomicus stammt aus der neoklassischen Ökonomie des späten 19. Jahrhunderts und bezeichnet einen modellhaften Menschen, der von wirtschaftlichen Zweckmäßigkeitserwägungen geleitetet wird.
6 Siehe hierzu das Buch Gesellschaft und Staat in Afrika (2001, Brandes & Apsel), in dem Hauck die sozialen, politischen und wirtschaftlichen Transformationsvorgänge vom vorkolonialen über das koloniale ins postkoloniale Afrika nachzeichnet
und gängige politsoziologische Deutungen kritisch behandelt.
7 Siehe hierzu Pfeffer, Clemens (2014): Rezension zu Gerhard Hauck. 2012. Globale
Vergesellschaftung und koloniale Differenz. In: Stichproben. Zeitschrift für
kritische Afrikastudien 14 (27), 105-112.

8 Siehe hierzu Gerhard Haucks Publikationen Evolution, Entwicklung, Unterentwicklung:

Gesellschaftstheoretische Abhandlungen (1996, IKO), Die Gesellschaftstheorie
und ihr Anderes: Wider den Eurozentrismus in den Sozialwissenschaften (2003,
Westfälisches Dampfboot), Kultur: Zur Karriere einer sozialwissenschaftlichen Kategorie
(2006, Westfälisches Dampfboot), Globale Vergesellschaftung und koloniale
Differenz: Essays (2012, Westfälisches Dampfboot).

9 Pereda, Carlos (1993): Zwei Modelle aufgeklärter Vernunft. In: Menke, Christoph/
Seel, Martin (Hg.): Zur Verteidigung der Vernunft gegen ihre Liebhaber
und Verächter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 129-148.

10 Randeria, Shalini (1999): Geteilte Geschichte und verwobene Moderne. In: Jegelka,
Norbert/Leitgeb, Hanna/Rüsen, Jörn (Hg.): Zukunftsentwürfe: Ideen für eine
Kultur der Veränderung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 87-96.

11 Siehe u.a. Habermas, Jürgen (1981): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
12 Meyer, John W./Rowan, Brian (1977): Institutionalized Organizations: Formal
Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363.

Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik
an den österreichischen Universitäten
Sensengasse 3
1090 Vienna, Austria

T +43 1 317 40 17
E office@mattersburgerkreis.at
Subscribe to our Newsletter
© 2015 Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten | Impressum