• 1.bestellen
  • 2.Warenkorb ändern
  • 3.zur Kassa gehen
Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 40-65https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-38-1-40
Acosta, Alberto; Brand, Ulrich; Moreno, Camila; Preiser, Anna

The Imperial Mode of Living: (Re)conceptualising Unequal North-South Relations

 

 

5.90 EUR
Stk
Austaller, Monika; Pfeffer, Clemens

Imperiale Lebensweise im Widerstreit: Von ‚solidarischer Lebensweise‘ und ‚kritisch-emanzipatorischer Transformation‘

Sprache: DeutschSeiten: 4-12https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-38-1-4
  • Abstract
  • Literatur

Einleitung

Brand, Ulrich (2005): Glokaler Widerstand: Die zapatistische Suche nach neuen Formen radikaler Politik. Ein Gespräch mit Ana Esther Ceceña und John Holloway. In: Ders. (Hrsg.): Gegen-Hegemonie. Perspektiven globalisierungskritischer Strategien. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag, 133-149. 


Brand, Ulrich/Hirsch, Joachim (2005): Suchprozesse emanzipativer Politik. Resonanzen des Zapatismus in Westeuropa. In: Brand, Ulrich (Hrsg.): Gegen-Hegemonie. Perspektiven globalisierungskritischer Strategien. Hamburg: VSA- Verlag, 119-132. 


Brand, Ulrich/Wissen, Markus (2017): Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur im globalen Kapitalismus. München: oekom. https://doi. org/10.3726/JP2017.21 


Boyer, Miriam (2006): Solidarische Vergesellschaftung indigener Gemeinschaften in Chiapas, Mexiko. In: Altvater, Elmar/Sekler, Nicola (Hg.): Solidarische Ökonomie. Reader des wissenschaftlichen Beirats von Attac. Hamburg: VSA, 103-111. 


Dorn, Felix Malte (2021): Inequalities in resource-based global production networks: resistance to lithium mining in Argentina (Jujuy) and Portugal (Região Norte). In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4), 70-91. https://doi. org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-37-4-70 


Enlace Zapatista (2021): HAY UNA MUJER. Contra la destrucción de la Naturaleza. Austria, Viena. 24.9.2021. https://enlacezapatista.ezln.org. mx/2021/09/27/hay-una-mujer-contra-la-destruccion-de-la-naturaleza-aus- tria-viena/#:~:text=una%20peque%C3%B1a%20historia%3A-,Hay%20una%20 mujer.,ella%20habitan%20todos%20los%20modos, 26.4.2022. 


Gilgenbach, Dominik/Moser, Bettina (2012): Lieber autonom als entwickelt? Zapatistische Autonomie als empirische Stütze des Post-Development? In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28 (4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-28-4-8 


Hillenbrand, Leticia (2021): „Reise für das Leben“: Die EZLN-Delegation ist in Wien eingetroffen. In: Amerika21. https://amerika21.de/blog/2021/09/254139/ ezln-delegation-ist-wien-eingetroffen, 15.2.2022. 


Kastner, Jens (2006): Rebellion, Revolte und Revolution überdenken. Kritische Einleitung in die zapatistisch inspirierte Theorie John Holloway. In: Holloway, John (2006): Die zwei Zeiten der Revolution. Würde, Macht und die Politik der Zapatistas. Wien: Turia + Kant, 7-36. 


Kothari, Ashish (2022): The flower of transformation. Alternatives for justice, sustainability and equity. www.meer.com/en/68872-the-flower-of-transforma- tion, 14.4.2022. 


Kerkeling, Luz (2003): ¡LA LUCHA SIGUE! – Der Kampf geht weiter. Münster: UNRAST-Verlag. 


Krause-Solberg, Lea (2018): Die Zapatistas in Mexiko - Hoy decimos ¡basta!. Eine Analyse der Zapatistas als soziale Bewegung. Arbeitspapier 1/2018 der Forschungsstelle Kriege, Rüstung und Entwicklung, Universität Hamburg. 


Landherr, Anna/Graf, Jakob (2021): Territoriale Macht und periphere imperiale Lebensweise – Internalisierungsmechanismen in der chilenischen Bergbaustadt Tierra Amarilla. In: Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 37 (4), 44-69. https://doi. org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-37-4-44 


ONU-DH – Naciones Unidas Derechos Humanos Oficina del Alto Comisio- nado México (2019): el proceso de consulta indígena sobre el Tren Maya no ha cumplido con todos los estándares internacionales de derechos humanos en la material. https://hchr.org.mx/comunicados/onu-dh-el-proceso-de-consulta- indigena-sobre-el-tren-maya-no-ha-cumplido-con-todos-los-estandares-inter- nacionales-de-derechos-humanos-en-la-materia, 15.4.2022. 


Sáenz, Charlotte Maria (2015): Women up in arms. In: Pambazuka News. www.pambazuka.org/gender-minorities/women-arms, 14.4.2022. 


Schmidinger, Thomas (2017): Krieg und Revolution in Syrisch-Kurdistan: Analysen und Stimmen aus Rojava. Wien: mandelbaum. 


Seufert, Jonas/Siepmann, Marcel (2021). Geplante „Maya“-Bahn durch Mexiko: Ein gefährlicher Zug. In: taz. 21.8.2021. https://taz.de/Geplante-Maya-Bahn-durch- Mexiko/!5791061/, 15.2.2022. 

 

Backhouse, Maria; Lorenzen, Kristina

Widersprüche der Bioökonomie. Extraktive Wissensproduktion und Landverhältnisse in Brasilien

Sprache: DeutschSeiten: 13-39https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-38-1-13
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

Nationale Bioökonomie-Strategien haben einen Transformationsprozess von einer fossilen zu einer biomassebasierten Wirtschaft zum Ziel. Sie eint der Technikoptimismus, dass die sozialökologische Krise über technologische Entwicklungen überwunden werden kann. Aus den kritischen Perspektiven der Politischen Ökologie und der Political Economy of Research and Innovation (PERI) sind Technologien und technologische Innovationen keine neutralen Werkzeuge zur Problemlösung, sondern grundsätzlich gesellschaftlich situiert. Vor diesem Hintergrund kontextualisieren wir die technologischen Innovationen für eine klimafreundlichere Produktion von Ethanol auf Zuckerrohrbasis im Rahmen einer qualitativen Studie in Mato Grosso do Sul in Brasilien. Dabei gehen wir der Frage nach, welche Implikationen „klimafreundliche“ Technologien auf Landzugang und Landnutzung haben. Es wird deutlich, dass die Bioökonomie im Bereich Ethanol eine extraktive Wissensproduktion fördert, die die sozialökologischen Probleme der Agrarindustrie fortsetzt.

Abascal, Almudena/Karg, Silke/Kretschmer, Regine/Schaffrath-Rosario, Angelika/ Schweikert, Florian (2016): Brasilien: Der Kampf der Guarani-Kaiowá um Land und Würde. FIAN Fact Sheet 1. Köln. www.fian-berlin.de/wp-content/ uploads/files/2016-1_FS_Guarani_final_screen.pdf, 4.11.2021.


ABIEC (2020): Beef Report. Brazilian Livestock Profile. São Paulo. http://abiec. com.br/en/publicacoes/beef-report-2020-2/, 9.9.2021.


Agarwal, Bina (1998): The Gender and Environment Debate. In: Keil, Roger/Bell, David V.J./Penz, Peter/Fawcett, Leesa (Hg.): Political ecology. Global and local. London/New York: Routledge, 193-219.


Alimonda, Héctor (2011): La colonialidade de la naturaleza. Una aproximación a la ecología política latinoamericana. In: Alimonda, Héctor (Hg.): La naturaleza colonizada. Ecología política y minería en América Latina, Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 21-58.


Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (2003): Identidade, distinção e territorialização. O processo de (re)criação camponesa no Mato Grosso do Sul. Dissertation. Universidade Estadual Paulista.


Assunção, Juliano/Pietracci, Breno/Souza, Priscila (2016): Fueling Development. Sugarcane Expansion Impacts in Brazil. https://climatepolicyinitiative.org/ wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Paper_Fueling_Development_Sugarcane_Expansion_Impacts_in_Brazil_Working_Paper_CPI.pdf.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Backhouse, Maria (2019): Agrarkraftstoffe. In: Brunner, Jan/Dobelmann, Anna/ Kirst, Sarah/Prause, Louisa (Hg.): Wörterbuch Land- und Rohstoffkonflikte. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839444337-004.


Backhouse, Maria (2020): The knowledge-based bioeconomy in the semi-periphery. A case study on second-generation ethanol in Brazil. Working Paper 13 der BMBF-Nachwuchsgruppe „Bioökonomie und soziale Ungleichheiten“. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbmedia/workingpaper13.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Backhouse, Maria (2021): Global Inequalities and Extractive Knowledge Production in the Bioeconomy. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina /Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5.


Backhouse, Maria/Lorenzen, Kristina/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (2017): Bioökonomie-Strategien im Vergleich. Gemeinsamkeiten, Widersprüche und Leerstellen. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 1. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena.de/sozbemedia/neu/2017- 09-28+workingpaper+1.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Bemmann, Martin/Metzger, Birgit/Detten, Roderich von (2014): Einleitung. In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 7-32. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845256948_11


Birch, Kean (2017): Innovation, Regional Development and the life science. Beyond clusters. London/New York: Routledge.


Blaikie, Piers M./Brookfield, H. C./Allen, Bryant James (1994): Land degradation and society. London/New York: Routledge.


Borges, Uta/Freitag, Heiko/Hurtienne, Thomas/Nitsch, Manfred (1984): PROAL- COOL. Analyse und Evaluierung des brasilianischen Biotreibstoffprogramms. Saarbrücken: Verlag Breitenbach.


Borras, Saturnino M./Franco, Jennifer C./Kay, Cristóbal/Spoor, Max (2011): Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean viewed from broader interna- tional perspectives. Rom. www.tni.org/files/download/borras_franco_kay__ spoor_land_grabs_in_latam__caribbean_nov_2011.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Brunner, Jan (2017): Die Verhandlungsmacht von Arbeiter*innen und Gewerkschaften in landwirtschaftlichen Transformationsprozessen: Eine Analyse des Zuckerrohrsektors im Bundesstaat São Paulo. GLOCON Working Paper Series 6. Berlin. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199099, 9.9.2021.


Caliari, Tânia (2016): Adeus, Guyraroká. https://apublica.org/2016/09/adeus- guyraroka/, 9.9.2021.


Damasceno, Rita/Chiavari, Joana/Lopes, Cristina Leme (2017): Evolution of Land Rights in Rural Brasil. Framework for understanding, pathways for improvement. Rio de Janeiro. www.inputbrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Evolu- tion_of_Land_Rights_In_Rural_Brazil_CPI_FinalEN.pdf,9.9.2021.


Defante, Lilliane Renata/Vilpoux, Olivier François/Sauer, Leandro (2018): Rapid expansion of sugarcane crop for biofuels and influence on food production in the first producing region of Brazil. In: Food Policy 79, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.06.005


Domingues, Alex Torres (2017): A territorialização do capital canavieiro no Mato Grosso do Sul. O caso da Bunge em Ponta Porã/MS. Masterarbeit. Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados.


Elwert, Georg (2002): Feldforschung. Orientierungswissen und kreuzperspektivische Analyse. Sozialanthropologisches Arbeitspapier. Freie Universität Berlin. www.latautonomy.com/DE_FeldforschungNEU.PDF, 9.9.2021.


European Commission (2018): A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Brüssel. https://doi.org/10.2777/792130.


Fabrini, João E. (2008): A posse e concentracão de terra no sul de Mato Grosso do Sul. In: Almeida, Rosemeire Aparecida de (Hg.): A questão agrária em Mato Gross do Sul. Uma visão multidisciplinar. Campo Grande: UFMS, 53-79.


Fatheuer, Thomas (2019): Zuckerträume. Ethanol aus Brasilien in der globalen Klimapolitik. Berlin: FDCL. www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/ FDCL_Zuckertra%CC%88ume_web.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick/Burke, Ian C. (2011): Potato Response to Simulated Glyphosate Drift. In: Weed Technology 25 (4), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1614/ WT-D-11-00001.1


Fernandes, Bernardo Mançano (1999): Contribuição ao Estudo do Campesinato Brasileiro Formação e Territorialização do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais sem Terra − MST (1979–1999). Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo.


Giersdorf, Jens/Nitsch, Manfred (2006): Biodiesel in Brasilien − ein neues PROÁL-COOL oder Chance für den Nordosten? KAS-Länderberichte Focus Brasilien. www.kas.de/documents/252038/253252/7_dokument_dok_pdf_7949_1. pdf/1be38a01-9bfc-b9c7-c088-afa911989dd2?version=1.0&t=1539665577294, 9.9.2021.


Gudynas, Eduardo (2019): Extraktivismen. Erscheinungsformen und Nebenwirkungen. In: Ramírez, Martín/Schmalz, Stefan (Hg.): Extraktivismus. Lateinamerika nach dem Ende des Rohstoffbooms. München: oekom, 19-38.


Harding, Sandra G. (2011): Introduction: Beyond Postcolonial Theory: Two Under-theorized Perspectives on Science and Technology. In: Harding, Sandra G. (Hg.): The postcolonial science and technology studies reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393849-001


Harvey, Mark/Bharucha, Zareen P. (2016): Political Orientations, State Regulation and Biofuels in the Context of the Food-Energy-Climate Change Trilemma. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/da Silveira, José Maria F.J./Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 63-92. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00003-4


Hatterman-Valenti, Harlene M. (2014): Simulated Glyphosate Drift to Potato Mother Plants and Effect on Daughter Tubers Used for Seed Production. In: Weed Technology 28 (1), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00107.1


Herrera, Selena/Wilkinson, John (2021): Sugar-Cane Bioelectricity in Brazil: Reinforcing the Meta-Discourses of Bioeconomy and Energy Transition. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-68944-5_8

 

Hutchinson, Pamela J.S./Felix, Joel/Boydston, Rick (2014): Glyphosate Carryover in Seed Potato: Effects on Mother Crop and Daughter Tubers. In: American Journal of Potato Research 91 (4), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-013- 9363-7


IPCC (2019): Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Summary for Policymakers. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Edited-SPM_Approved_Microsite_FINAL.pdf, 4.11.2021.


Jasanoff, Sheila (Hg., 2004): States of knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.


Karatepe, Ismail Doga/Scherrer, Christoph/Tizzot, Henrique (2020): Das Mercosur-EU-Abkommen: Freihandel zu Lasten von Umwelt, Klima und Bauern. Wiesbaden. www.uni-kassel.de/einrichtungen/fileadmin/datas/einrich- tungen/icdd/2020-01-24_EUMercosurAbkommen_01.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Kleinschmit, Daniela/Lindstad, Berit Hauger/Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark/Toppinen, Anne/Roos, Anders/Baardsen, Sjur (2014): Shades of green. A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. In: Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (4), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.921722


Lapola, David M./Schaldach, Ruediger/Alcamo, Joseph/Bondeau, Alberte/Koch, Jennifer/Koelking, Christina/Priess, Joerg A. (2010): Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biodiesel in Brazil. In: PNAS 107 (8), 3388- 3393. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107


Levidow, Les/Birch, Kean/Papaioannou, Theo (2012): Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. In: Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (1), 94-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143


Lorenzen, Kristina (2019): Sugarcane Industry Expansion and Changing Land and Labor Relations in Brazil. The Case of Mato Grosso do Sul 2000–2016. Bioeconomy and Inequalities Working Paper 9. Jena. www.bioinequalities.uni-jena. de/sozbemedia/WorkingPaper9.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi (2018): Etanol de Segunda Geração no Brasil: política e trans-lações. Dissertation. Universidade Federal de São Carlos.


Lorenzi, Bruno Rossi/Andrade, Thales Haddad Novaes de (2019): O Etanol da segunda geração no Brasil: Políticas e redes sociotécnicas. In: Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 34 (100), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/3410014/2019


Mengel, Aléx Alexandre (2015): Modernização da agricultura e pesquisa no Brasil: a Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária – EMBRAPA. Dissertation. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro.


Milanez, Artur Yabe/Souza, Jose Antonio P./Mancuso, Rafael (2017): Panoramas Setoriais 2030. Sucroenergético. Rio de Janeiro. web.bndes.gov.br/ bib/jspui/bitstream/1408/14245/2/Panoramas%20Setoriais%202030%20-%20 Sucroenegerg%c3%a9tico_P_BD.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Mintz, Sidney W. (1986): Sweetness and power. The place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books.


Miotto, Tiago (2018): Comunidade Guarani Kaiowá busca reverter no STF decisão que anulou demarcação. https://cimi.org.br/2018/09/comunidade-guarani- kaiowa-busca-reverter-no-stf-decisao-que-anulou-demarcacao/, 9.9.2021.


Mol, Arthur P.J./Spaargaren, Gert/Sonnenfeld, David A. (2014): Ecological Modernisation Theory: Where Do We Stand? In: Metzger, Birgit/Bemmann, Martin/Detten, Roderich von (Hg.): Ökologische Modernisierung. Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwis- senschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 35-66.


Moreno, Camila (2017): Landscaping a Biofuture in Latin America. Berlin: FDCL www.fdcl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FDCL_BIOEC_EN18072017-2. pdf, 9.9.2021.


Nardoque, Sedeval/Melo, Danilo Souza/Kudlavicz, Mieceslau (2018): Questão Agrária em Mato Grosso do Sul e seus Desdobramentos Pós-Golpe de 2016. In: OKARA: Geografia em debate 12 (2), 624-648. https://doi.org/10.22478/ ufpb.1982-3878.2018v12n2.41333


OECD (2009): The Bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. Paris. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264056886-en.pdf?expires=1611321448&id=id&accname=oid011481&checksum=441415F961CC3EA3F180EDD9BFB 79DC5, 9.9.2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264056886-9-en


OECD/FAO (2018): Agricultural Outlook 2018−2027. Rome/Paris. www.fao.org/3/I9166EN/I9166EN.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Pavão, Eugênio Da Silva (2005): Formação, estrutura e dinâmica da economia do Mato Grosso do Sul no contexto das transformações da economia Brasileira. Florianópolis. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30382814.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Repórter Brasil (2014): As condições de trabalho no setor sucroalcooleiro. http:// reporterbrasil.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/26.-Folder_Sucroalcooleiro_ web_baixa.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Robbins, Paul (2012): Political ecology. A critical introduction. Malden, Mass.: J. Wiley-Blackwell.


Robles, Wilder (2018): Revisiting Agrarian Reform in Brazil, 1985–2016. In: Journal of Developing Societies 34 (1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0169796X17749658


Salina, Fernando Henriques/Almeida, Isabela Aroeira de/Bittencourt, Felipe Ribeiro (2020): RenovaBio Opportunities and Biofuels Outlook in Brazil. In: Sayigh, Ali (Hg.): Renewable Energy and Sustainable Buildings. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 18488-9_30


Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro (2016): Conclusions: Futures of Bioethanol − Main findings and prospects. In: Salles-Filho, Sergio Luiz Monteiro/Cortez, Luís Augusto Barbosa/Silveira, José Maria F.J. da/Trindade, Sergio C. (Hg.): Global bioethanol. Evolution, risks, and uncertainties. London: Academic Press, 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803141-4.00023-X


Sant’Anna, Ana Claudia/Shanoyan, Aleksan/Bergtold, Jason Scott/Caldas, Marcellus M./Granco, Gabriel (2016): Ethanol and sugarcane expansion in Brazil. What is fueling the ethanol industry? In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 19 (4), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.22434/ IFAMR2015.0195


Schildberger, Barbara/Hanak, Karel/Regner, Ferdinand (2007): Untersuchung von Herbizidschäden im österreichischen Weinbau. In: Gesunde Pflanzen 59 (1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-007-0142-6


Tittor, Anne (2021): Towards an Extractivist Bioeconomy? The Risk of Deepening Agrarian Extractivism when Promoting Bioeconomy in Argentina. In: Backhouse, Maria/Lehmann, Rosa/Lühmann, Malte/Puder, Janina/ Rodríguez, Fabricio/Tittor, Anne (Hg.): Bioeconomy and Inequalities. Socio-Ecological Perspectives on Biomass Sourcing and Production across South America, Asia and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 309-329. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-68944-5_15


TNI/Hands on the Land (2015): The Bioeconomy. A primer. Transnational Insti- tute. www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/tni_primer_the_bioeconomy. pdf, 9.9.2021.


Tyfield, David/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel/Thorpe, Charles (2017): Introduction. Beyond crisis in the knowledge economy. In: Tyfield, David/Thorpe, Charles/Lave, Rebecca/Randalls, Samuel (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. London: Taylor and Francis, 1-18. https://doi. org/10.4324/9781315685397-1


Umweltbundesamt (2017): Biomassekaskaden. Mehr Ressourceneffizienz durch Kaskadennutzung von Biomasse – von der Theorie zur Praxis. Dessau- Roßlau. www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publika- tionen/2017-06-13_texte_53-2017_biokaskaden_abschlussbericht.pdf, 9.9.2021.


USDA (2019): Brazil: Biofuels Annual. GAIN Report Number: BR19029. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/report/downloadreportbyfilename?filename=Biofuels%20Annual_Sao%20Paulo%20ATO_Brazil_8-9-2019.pdf, 9.9.2021.


USDA (2020): Oilseeds and Products Annual. Brazil. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Oilseeds%20and%20Products%20Annual_Brasilia_Brazil_04-01-2020, 9.9.2021.


Wilkinson, John (2015): The Brazilian sugar alcohol sector in the current national and international conjuncture. Rio de Janeiro. http://actionaid.org.br/ wp-content/files_mf/1493419528completo_sugar_cane_sector_ing.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2008): Os agrocombustíveis no Brasil. Quais perspectivas para o campo? Brasília, DF. www.observatoriodoagronegocio.com. br/page41/files/AgroCBRPerspectivasNov08.pdf, 9.9.2021.


Wilkinson, John/Herrera, Selena (2010): Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. In: Journal of Peasant Studies 37 (4), 749-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.20 10.512457


Winter, Rainer (2009): Cultural Studies. In: Flick, Uwe/Kardoff, Ernst von/Steinke, Ines (Hg.): Qualitative Forschung. 7. Auflage. Reinbek: Rowohlt, 204-212.


Yin, Robert K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods. 4. Auflage. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.

 

Bioökonomie, extraktive Wissensproduktion, Bioenergie, Landzugang, Brasilien

Millesi, Teresa

An Ongoing Conquest – Confronting the Expansion of Capitalism in Indigenous Documentary Films

Sprache: EnglischSeiten: 66-82https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-38-1-66
  • Abstract
  • Literatur
  • Keywords

This article explores the relation between indigenous filmmaking and conflict due to expanding extractive industries in Latin America, and the documentary film potential to create new understandings of these situations. It specifically engages with two indigenous documentaries that focus on current territorial conflicts and environmental injustice: Júba Wajiín – Resistencia en la Montaña de Guerrero (2018) and Sangre y Tierra (2016). The article argues that these films enable a confrontation with current global modes of production, by articulating the expansion of capitalism as a process of increasing destruction, as an ongoing conquest

Barad, Karen (2003): Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. In: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (3), 801-830. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321


Brand, Ulrich/Wissen, Markus (2018): The limits to capitalist nature. Theorizing and overcoming the imperial mode of living. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield international.


Danowski, Déborah/Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (2017): The ends of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.


De la Cadena, Marisol/Starn, Orin (2007): Indigenous Expierence today. Oxford: Berg.


Dowell, Kristin (2006): Indigenous Media Gone Global. Strengthening Indigenous Identity On- and Offscreen First Nations/Features Film Showcase. In: American Anthropologist 108 (2), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.2.376


Ginsburg, Fay (1993): Aboriginal Media and the Australian Imaginary. In: Public Culture 5 (3), 557-558. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-5-3-557


Gräf, Dennis/Großmann, Stephanie/Klimczak, Peter, Krah, Hans/Wagner, Marietheres (2017): Filmsemiotik. Eine Einführung in die Analyse audio-visueller Formate. Marburg: Schüren.


Iovino, Serenella/Oppermann, Serpil (2014): Material Ecocriticism. Bloomington/ Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.


Kaplan, Ann (1997): Looking for the Other: Feminism, Film and the Imperial Gaze. New York: Routledge.


La Sandía digital (2020): Júba Wajiín - Sinopsis. https://lasandiadigital.org. mx/2020/09/28/juba-wajiin/, 01.08.2021.


Magallanes-Blanco, Claudia (2014): Talking About Our Mother: Indigenous Videos on Nature and the Environment. In: Communication, Culture, & Critique 8 (2), 199-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12084


Mignolo, Walter (2012): Local Histories/Global Designs. Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Woodstock: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691156095.001.0001


Murray, Stuart (2008): Images of Dignity. Barry Barclay and Fourth Cinema. Wellington: Huia Publishers.


Oppermann, Serpil (2016): From Material to Posthuman Ecocriticism: Hybridity, Stories, Nature. In: Zapf, Hubert (ed.): Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 273-294. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783110314595-016


Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco/Valdez, Sebastián Martín (2020): Media Cultures in Latin America. An Introduction. In: Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco (eds.): Media Cultures in Latin America. Key Concepts and New Debates. New York: Routledge, 1-21. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780429425127-1


Prins, Harald (2008): Visual Anthropology. In: Biolsi, Thomas (ed.): A companion to the anthropology of American Indians. Williston: Wiley, 506-525. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780470996270.ch27


Pueblo Nasa (2017): Libertad y alegría con Uma Kiwe. Palabra del Proceso de Liberación de la Madre Tierra. https://liberaciondelamadretierra.org/ wp-content/uploads/2017/04/liberacion_madre_tierra.pdf, 14.08.2021.


Rony, Fatimah (1996): The third eye. Race, Cinema, and ethnographic spectacle. Durham/NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822398721

 

Salazar, Juan Francisco/Córdova, Amalia (2020): Indigenous Media Cultures in Abya Yala. In: Pertierra, Anna Cristina/Salazar, Juan Francisco (eds.): Media Cultures in Latin America. Key Concepts and New Debates. New York: Rout- ledge, 128-146. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429425127-8


Sanjínes, Iván (2013): Usando el audiovisual como una estrategia de sobrevivencia y de lucha, de creación de un imaginario propio. In: Revista Chilena de Antropología Visual 21, 32-50.


Schiwy, Freya (2009): Indianizing Film. Decolonization, the Andes, and the Ques- tion of Technology. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.


Svampa, Maristella (2019): Neo-Extractivism in Latin America. Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108752589


Vargas Reyes, Bryan/Ariza Santamaría, Rosembert (2019): Liberación de la madre tierra: entre la legitimidad y los usos sociales de la ilegalidad. In: Revista Socio- Jurídicos 22 (1), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/ sociojuridicos/a.7641


Wilson, Pamela/Stewart, Michelle (2008): Introduction: Indigeneity and Indigenous Media on the Global Stage. In: Wilson, Pamela/Stewart, Michelle (eds.): Global Indigenous Media. Cultures, Poetics, and Politics. Durham: Duke University Press, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388692-001


Zamorano, Gabriela (2009): Reimagining politics. Video and indigenous struggles in contemporary Bolivia. Michigan: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

 

 

Keywords Indigenous film, documentary, Latin American film, land conflicts, capitalism

Contact
Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik
an den österreichischen Universitäten
Sensengasse 3
1090 Vienna, Austria

T +43 1 317 40 17
E office@mattersburgerkreis.at
Subscribe to our Newsletter
© 2015 Mattersburger Kreis für Entwicklungspolitik an den österreichischen Universitäten | Impressum
Display: